Download metadata

2016 Cybersecurity Report Data Set

By Innovation in Citizen Services Division (VPS/IFD/ICS)

This set comprises the data collected to inform the 2016 Cybersecurity Report entitled Cybersecurity Are we ready in Latin America and the Caribbean?, result of the collaboration between the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the Organization of American States (OAS), and the Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre (GCSCC) at the University of Oxford. It was collected through an online survey based on the Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Model (CMM) developed by the GCSCC and translated into two languages (English and Spanish). After a piloting stage, the survey was administered to a wide cross-section of national stakeholders in 32 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. The responses received were aggregated, reviewed, cleaned and complimented with additional sources of information.

Show more

Metadata & use

Identifier https://doi.org/10.60966/ths5uudn
License Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivs 3.0 IGO
Related Knowledge Product
Citation

Inter-American Development Bank;Organization of American States, 2015, 2016 Cybersecurity Report Data Set, IDB Open Data, https://doi.org/10.60966/ths5uudn
Published date 2015-12-14
Modified date 2025-04-11
Tags/Keywords Caribbean · Cyber Defense · Cyber Strategy · Cybercrime · Cybersecurity · Digital Redundancy · E-Government · Incident Response · Latin America · Legal Frameworks · National Critical Infrastructure · Online Trust · Privacy · Resilience
Language English
Temporal coverage 2015-2015
Country
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Bolivia
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Saint Lucia
St Kitts and Nevis
St Vincent and Grenadines
Suriname
Trinidad and Tobago
Uruguay
Venezuela
Region Latin America and the Caribbean
Publisher
Inter-American Development Bank
Author
Inter-American Development Bank
Organization of American States
Data collection type Survey Data
Statistical type Panel Data
Data structure Structured Data
Data notes

The data was analyzed using the 49 CMM indicators which are divided into five dimensions: i) National Cybersecurity Policy and Strategy (Policy and Strategy); ii) Cyber Culture and Society (Culture and Society); iii) Cybersecurity Education, Training and Skills (Education); iv) Legal and Regulatory Frameworks (Legal Frameworks); and v) Standards, Organizations and Technologies (Technologies). Each dimension has multiple factors which contribute towards a more mature state of cybersecurity capacity. Each factor then has several levels of indicators that describe a state of maturity (Startup, Formative, Established, Strategic and Dynamic). The different levels of maturity listed prompt the respondent to select the level that is most applicable to the experience of cybersecurity in the country. The results of the analysis were then sent to each country for validation. For more details please review the “Appendix: Detailed Methodological Framework” included in the 2016 Cybersecurity Report.

Dataset files

Load more